{"id":2622,"date":"2014-08-13T21:22:37","date_gmt":"2014-08-14T01:22:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jarodthornton.com\/bemis3lf\/?p=2622"},"modified":"2014-08-13T21:22:37","modified_gmt":"2014-08-14T01:22:37","slug":"hypothesize-observable-theory-love","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jarodthornton.com\/bemis3lf\/2014\/08\/13\/hypothesize-observable-theory-love\/","title":{"rendered":"Hypothesize &#8211; Observable Theory of Love"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>You are welcome to skip all the study below based on my observations and accept the following conclusion of&nbsp;<em><strong>what I believe is love.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<h1>Love is Virtuous Relationship<\/h1>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Relationship is intended to test my virtuous self by the morale of my heart to find love at little to no loss.<\/strong><br \/>\nHere&#8217;s what&nbsp;<strong><em>Thou art to my self<\/em>&nbsp;<\/strong>*<em>context outlined in study. &nbsp;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Using Science and Art<\/h2>\n<blockquote><p><strong>A Hypothesis<\/strong> (plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it.<br \/>\nScientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous observations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories.<br \/>\n<strong><em>A working hypothesis is a provisionally accepted hypothesis proposed for further research<\/em><\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"> &#8211; <a title=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hypothesis\" href=\"en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hypothesis\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hypothesis<\/a><\/span><br \/>\n________________<br \/>\n<strong>Talent<\/strong> was one of several ancient units of mass, a weight, as well as corresponding units of value equivalent to these masses of a precious metal. For example an Attic talent of silver was the value of nine man-years of skilled work.<br \/>\n<strong>The talent as a unit of value is mentioned in the New Testament in Jesus&#8217;s parable of the talents.&nbsp;<\/strong>This parable is the origin of the sense of the word &#8220;talent&#8221; meaning &#8220;gift or skill&#8221; as used in English and other languages &#8211;<span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"> <a title=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talent_(measurement)\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talent_(measurement)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talent_(measurement)<\/a><\/span>&nbsp; &#8211;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h3>Steps of the Scientific Method<\/h3>\n<p>The scientific method is a way to ask and answer scientific questions by making observations and doing experiments.<br \/>\n<strong>The steps of the scientific method are to:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Ask a Question<\/li>\n<li>Do Background Research<\/li>\n<li>Construct a Hypothesis<\/li>\n<li>Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment<\/li>\n<li>Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion<\/li>\n<li>Communicate Your Results<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em><strong>It is important for your experiment to be a fair test. A &#8220;fair test&#8221; occurs when you change only one factor (variable) and keep all other conditions the same.<\/strong><\/em><br \/>\n<a title=\"http:\/\/www.sciencebuddies.org\/science-fair-projects\/project_scientific_method.shtml\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencebuddies.org\/science-fair-projects\/project_scientific_method.shtml\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">sciencebuddies.org\/science-fair-projects\/project_scientific_method.shtml<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>The Single Step to Art<\/h3>\n<p>1) Learn to be true to your <em>self<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h3>Practical Application<\/h3>\n<p>Relationship is one of many&nbsp;difficult&nbsp;interpersonal communications to understand. &nbsp;An idea that relationships start with one self and one variable; self and another person. &nbsp;To determine which approach to take we test&nbsp;different theory with&nbsp;observable results. &nbsp;Sometimes we continue our testing with the same near copy of the variable. &nbsp;<strong>Einstein defined this as <em>insanity<\/em>; testing a theory with the same variable.<\/strong><br \/>\nCorrecting this hypothesis only requires a new variable which ideally adjusts the theoretical <em>hypotheses plural. &nbsp;<\/em>At&nbsp;some point we should reach a desired observable conclusion. &nbsp;However, many of us end up with an undesirable conclusion and we often throw in the towel and compromise our hearts by testing&nbsp;the same variable and accepting the conclusion is not intended to be desirable or that we&#8217;ve set our standards too high.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Getting Depth by Communication<\/h2>\n<p><strong>My choice in using those words that say the same thing as the&nbsp;more proper use of language; communication is intended. &nbsp;<\/strong><br \/>\nMy point is in using my writing style to effectively communicate my self; learned identity. &nbsp;It&#8217;s nothing new and just as all creation shares the same genetic cellular data; &nbsp;DNA or &nbsp;Deoxyribonucleic&nbsp;Acid; &nbsp;and made up the same dust, we are all wired similarly; God&#8217;s creation. &nbsp;Don&#8217;t ask me to spell&nbsp;DNA as such. &nbsp;Thank goodness for contextual spell check on the&nbsp;PC although, the mobile functions that perform similarly are not as easily learned tools for communication so we resort to use an adapted&nbsp;language&#8230;<br \/>\n<strong>We adapt the form of communication to to make it simpler and more effective to identify with others both as with the identity&nbsp;of self and the subject of Thou &#8211; <\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><a title=\"http:\/\/www.kencollins.com\/explanations\/why-05.htm\" href=\"http:\/\/www.kencollins.com\/explanations\/why-05.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">http:\/\/www.kencollins.com\/explanations\/why-05.htm<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Thee and Thou\u2014and the Great Pronoun Famine<\/h3>\n<p><strong>&nbsp;I learn to <em>pronounce<\/em>&nbsp;these unusual&nbsp;terms for&nbsp;use in<em>&nbsp;structuring<\/em>&nbsp;my idea to employ effective&nbsp;communication with&nbsp;<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">Thou<\/span>, my variable subject. &nbsp;<\/strong><br \/>\nI&#8217;ve learned to pronounce in&nbsp;terms&nbsp;of structuring my variable; subject, as <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">It<\/span> in the past and I observed it was leading to loss so I decided to test these terms to find love and those two words make the difference by defining what is a most desirable subject and what is a desirable object. &nbsp;Terms by which I test defined by a desirable subject results in finding <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">love<\/span>&nbsp;however, the terms by which I define as an object always lead to failure and heartache; <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">loss<\/span>.<br \/>\n<strong>We already communicate this way with everything that <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">IS<\/span> our understanding of God. &nbsp;If God is Thou He is our subject of God whereas if God is It He becomes the object of God. &nbsp;This is true with all things all places and all times. &nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>Self and the Variable of Relationship<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Relationship is not intended to convey the plural form of the word. &nbsp;I use the word singularly as relationship is communication between my self and Thou.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>Firing Glass Walls<\/h3>\n<p>Risk is involved due to our experience with variable who&#8217;s character may not be fit to the ideal relationship; the best idea of&nbsp;relationship. &nbsp;Often there is a compromise resulting in heartache. It doesn&#8217;t have to conclude with any&nbsp;compromise in that of risk involved in <em><strong>finding relationship behind glass walls; we take our&nbsp;chances to find true love<\/strong><\/em>.<br \/>\nAcceptance of the data which leaves us disappointed eventually, building upon the resolved position, will build <em>glass walls<\/em>. &nbsp;So it&#8217;s apparent by these terms that we build the glass walls keeping us from getting what we can clearly see is the best idea of true love.<br \/>\n<b><i>These glass walls are fired by the scientific method&nbsp;of talent in the furnace of self.&nbsp;<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<h4>It&#8217;s absolutely both science and art.<\/h4>\n<p><em><strong>Let us now test&nbsp;this hypothesis&nbsp;that&nbsp;talent determines relationship.<\/strong><\/em><br \/>\nWe cannot get what we want <strong><em>from<\/em><\/strong> our relationship. &nbsp;Rather, our best targeted efforts to find a working equation; finding&nbsp;what is&nbsp;required; what we find <strong><em>of&nbsp;<\/em><\/strong>our relationship with the&nbsp;variable.<br \/>\nI purposefully attempt to make an intellectual approach to finding love in relationship because my scientific hypothesis creates&nbsp;the most logical test to prove that I&#8217;m a talented artist of love &#8211; lol.<br \/>\n<strong>Often we also have a skewed idea of what we want, or what is likely best for us emotionally, mentally and&nbsp;otherwise. &nbsp;<\/strong><br \/>\nFrom my own observation I&#8217;ve reached no conclusion except my prior attempts have been unsuccessful and now that I have a deeper understanding, after many failures, I am adjusting the variable &#8211; not a plural value but a&nbsp;<em>single variable&nbsp;<\/em>that is relationship to Thou, the subject of my <em><strong>hopeless romantic<\/strong><\/em>. &nbsp;For this variable to <strong><em>change a lonely heart<\/em> <\/strong>there is the risk of failing yet again however, we are changing the variable and it&#8217;s a worthwhile risk if you have the best idea fit for variable.<br \/>\nThe nearest encounter&nbsp;of&nbsp;the best ideal;&nbsp;variable characteristics of relationship that meet our standards for proof our hypothesis is worth the risk and does not ever&nbsp;conclude a&nbsp;theory of&nbsp;<strong><em>loss<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;but rather proving a conclusion of&nbsp;<em><strong>love<\/strong><\/em>.&nbsp;The highest calling in life is<em><strong> learning&nbsp;love<\/strong><\/em> and it is exactly a science defined as love as art. &nbsp;It is&nbsp;only by some hope the muster of faith that love is a reality we keep taking the risk to find true love.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Two Fold<\/h2>\n<p>Loss is what breaks our heart because we end up with nothing but an empty and dark hole inside; emptiness. &nbsp;Love fulfills the heart and fills the hole; the emptiness; by learning&nbsp;how to <strong><em>love in art<\/em>&nbsp;<\/strong>those&nbsp;subjects of our testing hypotheses; <strong><em>learning thou<\/em>&nbsp;<\/strong>may be fulfilled by love and in turn fill by the same measures.<br \/>\n<em><strong>What I am trying to outline here is how love and loss is two fold and at some point intersects at one or the other fold.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<h3>Our Morale<\/h3>\n<p>Our morals are a set of standards to test morale by. &nbsp;Just as you would say precious metals are tested by a furnace to reach the most desirable purity, morale are&nbsp;tested by the flames to reach the most desirable idea and result; finding true love. &nbsp;This testing would lead us to observation that our standards improve as it is learned to reach higher success in&nbsp;finding the best variable thus purity in&nbsp;relationship and true love.<\/p>\n<h3>Finding True Love<\/h3>\n<p>I&#8217;ve referenced this observation of testing standards and finding more desirable results; <em><strong>relationship<\/strong><\/em>; &nbsp;as a variable <em><strong>fit to the ideal&nbsp;subject of Thou<\/strong><\/em><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>and <em><strong>finding true love<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n<h3>Leading to Loss<\/h3>\n<p>The second observation is&nbsp;the exact opposite and leads to undesirable results; <em><strong>compromise<\/strong><\/em>; variable&nbsp;<em><strong>fit<\/strong> <strong>to the<\/strong><strong><em>&nbsp;<\/em>subject of Thou by&nbsp;idea.<\/strong><\/em><br \/>\n<em><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Self Conclusion Definitive<\/h2>\n<p><strong>We will never achieve a definitive conclusion we&#8217;ve found love without testing our standards risking our heart &#8211; self &#8211; unless we risk our heart to suffer self loss;<em> &nbsp;the pain of breaking self by testing our morale by standards of our ideal relationship.<\/em><\/strong><br \/>\nThis is a conclusion reached by the scientific method of hypothesizing ideas of how to find love and avoid being led to loss.<\/p>\n<h3>It is exactly Art and Science<\/h3>\n<p>We use what intellect we have to test our ideas of love. &nbsp;We use what creation of love we find to make love as art. &nbsp;A second conclusion reached only does what science does, asks the next question;&nbsp;<em><strong>&nbsp;what is love?<\/strong><\/em><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>The results become our standards; the&nbsp;heart. &nbsp;We test&nbsp;the heart&nbsp;by a risk&nbsp;of being&nbsp;led to inconclusive result; loss. &nbsp;For me&nbsp;the hypothesized constant and variable are <em><strong>self and thou<\/strong><\/em>.<br \/>\nSelf is our control; we are in control of self. &nbsp;Thou is our variable; we can adjust our variable but cannot control them; they are not our control. &nbsp;When both are methodically tested by the theoretical idea of love we are tested by relationship; the resulted environment is what we find of definitive love of Thou. &nbsp;By this science we can also find results defining what love is not; by relationship.<\/p>\n<h2>What is love<\/h2>\n<p>The King James Version of the Holy Christian Bible has an interesting word to use in place of love<b><i>;<\/i>&nbsp;<\/b><strong><em>charity.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>Charity<\/h3>\n<p>This word is&nbsp;exactly the one word you would use to describe what love is. &nbsp;Charity is something that is given and received &nbsp;It also the action of taking love once found.<br \/>\n<em><strong>Charitable Giving<\/strong><\/em><br \/>\nCharitable giving is the <em>act of love&nbsp;<\/em>by means of a worthy cause such as true love in relationship. Charitable giving as an act of love&nbsp;is referred to as behavior showing high moral standards. &nbsp;These are those very standards by which we test our hearts self and Thou to find resulting love.<\/p>\n<h3>Finding Love by Virtue<\/h3>\n<p>There&#8217;s the word to define our&nbsp;moral standards.<br \/>\nNow&nbsp;are all the words to say <em><strong>finding love only comes by testing our morale against virtue.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<h1>Love is Virtuous Relationship<\/h1>\n<p>My relationship is intended to test my virtuous self&nbsp;by the morale of my heart to find love and experience little or no&nbsp;loss. &nbsp;By these measures true love is very easily given and received. &nbsp;By understanding this I also accept the measure of taking love if found fit to ideal relationship.<br \/>\n<em>Photo of sunset on the horizon from the beaches of West Palm Beach, Fl by Jarod Thornton.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>You are welcome to skip all the study below based on my observations and accept the following conclusion of&nbsp;what I believe is love. Love is Virtuous Relationship Relationship is intended to test my virtuous self by the morale of my heart to find love at little to no loss. Here&#8217;s what&nbsp;Thou art to my self&nbsp;*context [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2624,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-relationships"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jarodthornton.com\/bemis3lf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jarodthornton.com\/bemis3lf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jarodthornton.com\/bemis3lf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jarodthornton.com\/bemis3lf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jarodthornton.com\/bemis3lf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2622"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jarodthornton.com\/bemis3lf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2622\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jarodthornton.com\/bemis3lf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2624"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jarodthornton.com\/bemis3lf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jarodthornton.com\/bemis3lf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jarodthornton.com\/bemis3lf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}